Spelunking the Universe
Archive for June, 2009
Cognitive Dissonance
Jun 29th
Cognitive Dissonance
Is a tragic romance
of what is
and what is not
of what actually was
and how we think it was
Fatal fantasy
of a fictitious reality
leading wars and tragedies
prominently into now
Cognitive Dissonance
masked behind morality
greatest tragedy
to ever befall man
as it strips the ease
as much as it can
fed by frail minds
of all kinds
Cognitive Dissonance
sitting kingly
upon a throne of solid bone
as it commands those
watching mindless shows
making sure to hose
the fires of reality
from their rightful place
in our cognitive faculty
The Baloney Detection Kit by Michael Shermer
Jun 24th
Since this video is 14 minutes (nearly 15) I’ll leave you with this today. This is the best video I’ve ever watched on youtube, some of you may not enjoy it but I feel it was fantastically done and deserves every view it gets.
Thought Experiment: Bilateral Cloning
Jun 23rd
When discussing cloning there is a general question of whether or not the new clone would retain the memories of its parent organism. Generally speaking I can think of absolutely no reason why this would be the case however it got me thinking.
I believe I’ve discussed before the fact that the right side of the brain and the left side of the brain can function while entirely separated from their sister lobe assuming they still have all the connections to the body that keep them alive. While these are both in the same body it appears that the person still is a single person.
What would happen though if we split a person bilaterally from top to bottom and connected each side to the required machinery to keep them alive. Perhaps in a future with advanced cybernetics we could give them half mechanical and half organic. At any rate, my point is this, would each function as the original did? We have created two people out of one person and not only that but each has the ability to function just as the originally did, however half as fast (well not literally but a separated brain does not function as well as a full brain…which isn’t a shock).
Would each side make the same choices when presented with the same stimuli? How evenly split would the memories of the person be? How well would they function as a team? Do we consider this as two individual people or one person? That final question is the one that is blowing my mind a bit.
Is a person split in half and still alive a single person or two people? It seems to break the black and white view of a person or an organism in general. It is another case of something seemingly obvious that is in no way obvious. It also is an important question when looking at a mother and the child within her. At what point do we consider them as two individual people, is it because they have each a set of organs? If so would that mean that a person split bilaterally would now no longer be a person at all?
The things that keep my brain moving are so odd sometimes…
“…how to go to heaven, not how the heavens go”
Jun 22nd
I’m sure I’ve quoted this enough times that it looks like I’d sleep with Galileo or at the very least take him to dinner (which I surely would…dinner that is). This phrase is, to me, one of the most powerful statements in the history of civilized man. The full line is "The Bible was written to show us how to go to heaven, not how the heavens go."
While I am known for my rather callous feelings towards religion. This is not the goal of this post and indeed 99% of my posts are not trying to butcher the faithful upon a pedestal. What I’m here to discuss today especially is what religion cannot do and will never be able to do.
There has never and will never be a scientific use for faith. All of the benefits that people get medically from being religious have been seen with equal success in merely positive people. It provides absolutely no aid to any real world field of science. This is no a negative to faith, because it was never meant to do such a thing (or at least I don’t believe it ever outwardly advertised such), however in modern day it is a huge flaw that is overlooked by many who have vendettas against certain scientific beliefs.
Obviously to many this is a post in response to intelligent design, formerly known as creationism, and even before that known by 4-5 names. As was stated in a very good book I’ve been reading (“only a theory”) it would appear that more often than not religion is not trying to explain how something works but instead is trying to merely get credit for the something.
You cannot discover how malaria spreads, why the suns light gives people skin cancer, nor can it even explain why people cannot breath underwater. We didn’t decode the human genome with a single bit of guidance by any book of faith nor did we make it to the moon through the discoveries found in any scripture.
There will never be a time when faith can properly function as a scientific tool and likewise there will never be a time when science can function properly as a tool of faith. Each is by its very roots incompatible with the other. This is not to say you cannot be a faithful scientist, that is a scientists who for whatever reason has religious convictions, but neither will benefit the other. They exist in solitude from one another and that is by no means a bad thing.
The danger is when we make the mistake of assuming that faith can save our biological selves. We do not need another era of trephinations to remind us of what happens when we fight that truth. So as many have, much more eloquently than I, this is a modest request to cease and desist with the incessant attempts to use faith as a tool of science. In the end it helps no one and creates various problematic and violent situations.
Well that’s it for today, I will likely discuss the book linked above once I finish it. It is fantastic though and roughly 50% of the way through it I suggest anyone read it who has the ability to do so.
Returning Tomorrow
Jun 21st
I know for some of my daily readers it has likely been a long week. Tomorrow will be the return of the Spelunking. I already have two topics that have been previously discussed but deserve a new glossing over and am likely to have plenty to discuss about the universe of Scion. Again I appreciate all the new users that join up (you know the non spambot ones) and hopefully I can get around to doing a new website interface that is a little more user friendly.
So again see you all tomorrow and I appreciate your waiting for me to get back to the technological real world.
Vacation
Jun 15th
I’m a bit late but I wanted to inform folks I will basically not have access to internet and/or PC’s for the next week. So unfortunately the site won’t be updated between now and then
. But once I’m back we’ll start right back up.
Enjoy your vacation and see you soon.
Liberalism vs. Conservatism: A Thought
Jun 12th
Now I am probably overlooking something very obvious. But for the life of me, I can’t help but notice that every great genocide, every worldwide injustice, and basically every major negative event that you can find in history books was committed by either a conservative nation or governing body.
Even now basically the most violent countries in the world are lead by extremely conservative bodies, I just thought that was really odd. You would think with that sort of situation that the conservative platform would be very unpopular.
However I’m open to being incorrect and would like for some people to present great atrocities committed by Liberal states. Heck it would be neat to see someone research the topic and have in one column all the historical atrocities by Liberal states and then all the historical atrocities of Conservative states.
At the very least it is food for though.