Posts tagged Science and Mathematics
The “Ordered” Universe–Because it is.
There is often a point made about the universe, about everything that is around us. The gist of the point is that “There is obviously a designer, a watch requires a watchmaker, and a universe run by laws must have a lawmaker.” This is very pleasing to the ear and to the mind as long as you don’t take longer than two seconds to think about it. The moment you do it falls apart and it falls apart hard.
The observation that the universe is governed by strict laws is ultimately a redundant observation, the universe must be as it is if we are to be as we are. If the universe were different in any way then we would be different (if we existed at all), to clarify “we” are merely the things observing the universe. If there is nothing conscious in another universe then the “we” is a null value. But regardless of what universe you examine and the species within it, the reasoning behind their being there is entirely redundant.
Because no matter what the case were, the questions would be exactly the same and the reasoning would be exactly the same. While I used to give my parents a bit of a grimace when I got the “Because I said so.” line from them I must admit that in this case a similar response must be made. The universe is ordered because it is ordered. You are sitting or standing where you are because you are sitting or standing where you are. We see visible light because whatever light we would have sensed would have been called Visible light, that range of light is only special because it is special to us, if we were different in any way we would be making the exact same observation about a different range of visible light.
We are on Earth not because Earth is special but because whatever planet we would have been on anywhere in the entire universe would have been judged with equal curiosity. It would have been the “special one” for no other reason than it happened to be the one we spawned on. There is no necessary designer behind the universe because the universe must exist in some fashion or another, if that fashion were a null fashion then more power to it. There could have been a trillion trillion universes before this specific one, each one with beings that too tried to explain why their own unique composition was the one. What made it special was not that it was special but that it was what the outcome was.
Just like rolling a die, there must be an outcome to the roll (at least in the philosophical sense) there are 6 choices, and the one you are left with is not chosen because it is divine, or because it is pre-thought or unique, but because it was the choice. Essentially the universe is ordered because, as humans, the only way humans would have examined the universe would be if it was ordered. If it wasn’t ordered we wouldn’t exist as we are but whatever that did exist would be asking the exact same questions (for a short while at least), they would be no more unique than us, and the universe they’d be in would be no more unique than ours. These things must be the way they are for us to wonder why they are as they are because no matter how they were we’d be wondering. There is always an outcome to the dice roll and if you knew nothing of the other 5 possibilities you would assume that there was something special about that dice roll, wherein fact there was nothing unique about it at all.
Don’t get me wrong, I am infinitely fascinated by the entire universe and of the possibilities of things unknown. But the desire to know “Why Earth?” or “Why this Universe?” or “Why is it ordered?” are all fruitless questions, beyond knowing how to best sustain our own physiology they will not bring us unique information because if you changed the variables to some other variant the questions would still exist, they are entirely malleable and don’t hold educational value in that respect. These questions are no more productive than pondering if we are in a Matrix or a Brain in a Vat. All they tend to do is waste time in the case of furthering advance in science, which is a shame because the further Science travels the more wonders we will discover.
Just don’t get caught up in explaining why the universe is, because at the end of the day it is and all the explanations in the universe will not make it change (for if they did the best you’ve done is get yourself killed, the living thing is not fond of extreme sudden change). I realize it’s fun to think about but it does not provide any useful information because the questions all apply to every possible variation of existence wherein anything capable of asking the questions would exist.
Note: That was very difficult to write since I’m trying to explain the circular logic of this profoundly wasteful question and it seems to drag you into circular answers. Which I think helps explain my point better than my attempts to explain it did.
Rico Examines “Evolution and Economics”
So I’ve been reading Richard Dawkin’s “The Greatest Show on Earth”, interestingly for a guy who is constantly described as condescending and downright mean his book thus far has been really well thought out and pleasant. He’s barely mentioned faith at all and seemed to make an effort to separate faithful from “those people” (Creationists/Young Earthers). He seems genuinely concerned with people trying to discount Physics and about a half dozen other sciences as being “other forms of faith”. But I digress, that is not what this post is about
.
In the book Dawkin’s mentions something about rats, how through selective breeding in a matter of 30 or so generations (or even quite a bit less) you can generate rats who have far better dental than those not selected specifically to enhance those traits. Likewise you can make rats who get really crappy teeth fairly quickly. He mentions in this chapter, “Why if man can make a rat with awesome teeth can nature not? One would assume that long surviving healthy teeth would do nothing but enhance the survival rates of the hose animal.” Which was interestingly timed because I was thinking the same thing.
I had been wondering about all the monsters that folks create for movies, these apex predators with amazing senses, huge muscular structures, good bones, and many cases wings because obviously flying is badass. One would assume that these creatures should be inevitable in life, likewise the question arises even on a smaller scale, why if Human’s have gotten these fairly awesome brains have other animals not jumped on the bandwagon? They are sexy organic computers that have helped us to create super cool things. One would think that any animal would benefit, much like the rats from the fancy teeth.
To this question, that he assumed (rightly) would form from the discussion of that rat experiment, he responded with an Economics quote that I’ll paraphrase “There is no such thing as a free lunch.” The Calcium necessary for those teeth must come from somewhere, in lab rats it is simply supplemented with a seemingly endless supply of nutrient rich food. But in the wild the Rat would have to get that calcium from somewhere. It would be taking it away from the rest of it’s bone structure, or in females from the milk production, or any other process in the body that needs that Calcium. In the end, having slightly worse teeth for the wild rats might be beneficial because the calcium they’d have used in those teeth can then be used for other operations in the body that may actually extend their life even further.
Which brings me back to the human brain thing. I’ve read, long before this book, about the reason why humans are so gung-ho on fat and high calorie diets. Obviously being warm blooded is a big part of it, but beyond being walking waste machines (we do burn through energy really fast), we also have incredibly nutrient hungry brains. These big grey batches of yogurt are very big on the high fat high calorie diets that we take in, it makes them happier than a clam (both of which I don’t think actually feel happy, but you get my point). At a point in the history of our particular branch of the animal Kingdom there was a period of very high fertility in the land where our ancestors lived. This provided them with the resources they needed for a mutation of the brain to actually work, before that point HAD the event occurred the animal carrying that new brain would have not had the food supply to support the new infrastructure and would have likely died off.
It’s hardly a give-in, by stuffing animals full of vitamins and minerals for centuries we have no certainty that they’d suddenly get awesome brains and be able to help us fight the inevitable ape uprising. However it makes me wonder how many times in the past a really neat strain of an animal has arisen and died off because it couldn’t support the new workings of its body. Requiring perhaps more vitamin C than was available, or Vitamin D, or Calcium, or Iron. The only thing killing off it’s otherwise (subjectively) superior body was the environment not supplying it with the funds (so to speak) it needed to succeed.
We, long ago, hit a point where we begin a cyclical system of altering our environment to meet the ever (however slowly) changing needs of our bodies. We’ve reached the point now that any mutation we have can likely be met with environmental changes to help support it, providing us with an infinitely many versions of humans that can survive…at least hypothetically.
It’s an amazing moment personally, wondering just what has been lost or what could be gained in the animal kingdom given a sustained period of fruitfulness, however I find that the odds of this happening with humans around is quite a bit lower than it once was (we’ll utterly consume any place that begins to thrive). At any rate, it’s a neat bit of info. If anyone was ever wondering why animals don’t get X, the above is the basic reasoning. Every mutation requires resources and if those resources are taken away from even (for the moment) more important bodily functions that mutation will fail. It is only the mutations that result in a slightly longer lifespan (and thusly more chances to breed) that lead onto new strains of the animal, and those strains will only survive for as long as their needs are met by the environment. They could still vanish if the environment suddenly changes and their “inferior” cousins could end up returning to power.
Bah…I’ll end up bantering on about how neat this is to me. So I’ll just leave it at that. More to come I’m sure.
Rico Examines “BP Oil Spill”
So the estimate I’ve heard is that it will take 90 days to repair the BP Oil Spill, that is to say, it will take them 90 full days to drill a relief valve and stop the spill from pouring an unfathomable amount of oil (you honestly can’t fathom it legitimately) into the Gulf of Mexico.
I have to raise the flag on what appears to be BS from BP. I’m not here to strike a flint in hopes of lighting the company aflame but there is no way it actually takes 90 days. It takes 15 hours to fly from the US to Japan and drop a warhead that wipes an entire city off the face of the map, and the bomb itself would only take 4 times as long as the estimate for this drilling to be made (assuming you have the fissile material which is a fair exception considering BP already has the materials necessary to repair the problem). Now those might seem like loose comparisons, and quite frankly they are, but I’m just trying to give a judgment of time here. BP is saying that it will take one fourth the time it takes to wipe an entire city off the face of the map, from the entire distance of the Pacific Ocean, as it would to locate and repair a situation using far less elaborate materials in a location you can sail to (with nice winds) in 1 to 2 hours. That’s just assuming that nobody in this year has a boat with an engine…
I wouldn’t be so quick to judge, as I rarely critique the work of a surgeon, but their fixes are what lay the groundwork for my judgment. They attempt first to cap it off like a gushing fire hydrant, then they decide to try a smaller cap, next they’ll try to just re-route the flow with a tap system (from what I understand), and finally…they’ll try just stuffing a bunch of random stuff into it and hope it clogs. This last one is what got me. If it is that easy why don’t they just take a thick fabric like emergency raft material, coat it in something that is very resistant to moisture and oil and stuff it into the pipe then inflate it? If golf balls and tire shreds are enough to clog it then surely a tough hide inflatable material can do it.
That should take all of a weekend to pull off. It might sound like a lot of work but when you have the kind of money oil companies have you could pull of something like this for a party in a day easy. Secondly I move on to the idea that it will take them 90 days to produce a new functional hole to stop the problem. There is absolutely no way this can possibly be true-90 days is a really long time. You know what you can do in 90 days? You could fly from the Earth to the Moon and back nearly 18 times, with 2-3 people you could build a 2,800 square foot home, you could get 18 E60 BMW’s custom ordered and shipped to you.
Want 18 of these? Not my thing but you’d have them in custom order before BP finishes repairing the oil spill. Course then you’d have to fill them all up with gas…oh dear.
BP has over 80 thousand employees, or enough people to build between 26,000 and 40,000 houses in the time it is quoted to take them to repair a single blown pipe. It isn’t fair of me to assume all those people are skilled in this kind of repair work but I’m more trying to stress the fact they have an enormous staff and lest we forget the 239 billion dollars they brought in according to their website in 2009, they aren’t exactly hurting for cash to invest in a quick repair.
Had they been honest about the situation or even cared in the slightest this would have been taken care of at most two weeks after the situation occurred. It would have taken that long only because they’d have invested dubious amounts of time to assure that they won’t screw up and cause a bigger problem. The actual work would have taken 3 days of straight work with revolving crews and we’d be looking back on this as a really bad but at least expertly resolved incident.
The biggest humor in this sluggish and unenthusiastic repair is the this is the company who has one of the most “nature friendly” looking logos of any company in existence today.
“Look at our earthy green, sunny yellow, and life white all meshed into a hybrid flower-sun. We love nature that’s why we drill for Oil <3”
I don’t necessarily begrudge them for drilling for oil, but their logo annoys me. They are quite intentionally trying to grasp the shapes and colors that make the brain view them as a nature conscious company whose main goal is to circumvent natural catastrophes. But instead a multi-billion dollar mega company is just dragging its feet with merry disregard as a completely manageable situation unfolds without halt.
It took the US less than a year to invade a country on the other side of the planet and locate a single human being who was hiding in a hole. A hole that was amidst an area of land that measured a full 169,234 square miles. The average person is something like 3 feet across, and something like 5 square feet total space taken, which means (with my shoddy math) there were 178,711,104 unique spaces in Iraq that Saddamn could have been standing (assuming a flat landmass and people standing one by one beside one another…there are far more places in actuality). We found him…we found that 1 in 178 million in less than a year.
How on Earth can that happen so quickly and yet this repair work is going to take 90 days? I don’t see it, both the US and BP have a stake in this incident, how neither could at least stop the leak on a weekend is beyond me. Just a matter of spending too much time pointing fingers and not long enough time putting a finger in the leak.
Rico Examines “The Beauty of Mathematics.”
I am a huge fan of numbers. I love statistics dearly and enjoy any sort of comparative diagram. Especially when dealing on the astronomical scale, the reality of how small I truly am is very exciting and opens doors in the mind that are difficult to get ajar. They never seem to open wide but just trying is such a treat.
Mathematics, is at its heart, the only subjective truth in the universe. At least that I know of so far, it is this subjectivity that gives it beauty to me. It is difficult to tarnish math, one of my favorite quotes about this says “Statistics don’t lie, People do.” Math is a sanctuary, a land one can travel that is not tainted by morality, or belief, it is something of solid true objective meaning. Math will never betray you and as long as you are willing to learn it will open a seemingly infinite number of doors. Man…back to that door metaphor.
Admittedly this is not really an examination as much as it is a love letter to math. Which I believe is a bit ironic because I am not a stellar mathematician. I love a good excel sheet, I enjoy calculating things in my head, and I am all aflutter when I see a new time to make a complex formula. But I am, perhaps hypocritically so, not good at the highest levels of mathematics. This creates a deeper wonder and desire to learn it however, to see numbers in their full beauty.
Astrophysics and Fractals are two of my favorite examples of mathematics. The first because as I had mentioned before astronomically large numbers excite me. Visually let me grab a picture:
This image is of an “Earth Sized Hole” that was left on Jupiter after a Meteor Impact. The entire Earth, this massive swath of rock that we call home. The surface that more than 6 billion people all live upon. Millenia of documented human history have transpired on. All of this is but a mere spec on a slice of Jupiter. The staggering difference in sizes, those massive differences in numbers. That, I believe, is true beauty.
To continue on this Earth Jupiter topic, let me grab a few other numbers. I weight about 135 lbs on Earth. If I was on Jupiter I would weigh 319.5 lbs! Gravity itself requires an intense amount of matter for you to feel the results (just think with the entire size of the Earth it is merely holding you against the surface, not even crushing you to a pulp). That said, Jupiter has enough extra mass to more than double my weight! 2.3x heavier if you were curious (roughly). Speaking of mass, Jupiter contains 300 times the mass of Earth. If that doesn’t metaphorically crap your pants I honestly don’t know what will. Just try to grasp that, all the mass of earth replicated 300 times! I can’t even properly visualize the full surface area of my city, let alone my state, or my continent, or the Moon or Earth, and here is an object that dwarfs us to a point of obscurity. The diameter of Jupiter is insane as well being over ten times that of Earth. I would have a 30 foot wide waist if that were the case, which would make it very difficult to fit through…doors. Unless I stood sideways, however our hallway is only about 10 feet across. Which raises more issues.
I’ve shown before the pale blue dot, an image of the Earth where we are a single pixel on a massive picture of space. A single spec of light emitting from a vast unknown. When thinking about Jupter, and how it dwarfs our size. Even Jupiter is but a child in a room of adults. Our sun could swallow Jupiter hundreds of times over (an understatement).
So here we are. Examining a marble, that marble an object 300 times the size of Earth. That Earth ~1,260,000,000,000,000,000,000 times larger than the average person. These numbers all becoming awash in our minds. Or at the very least mine. These things are astounding, nearly unimaginable (I try to stray from impossibilities), yet numbers can swallow up these things and produce manageable data. This is the ultimate power of subjectivity, the ultimate beauty of mathematics, and one of the reasons I get a cognitive ‘boner’ every time I’m presented with data. It also gives me another reason to remind people why they are so inconsequential in size and why that is not a bad thing
.
Update: I would be remiss if I didn’t plug a few of my Fractal Artworks while discussing the beauty of Math:
Coming this Week on TheIOS:
ADIOS: The King of Spes: Votum.
IIWP (If I was President): Taxation
Thought Experiment: Life and Intelligence
The following is not necessarily fact, indeed this is just a thought experiment on why I’m not too amazed that there is life or that life can manifest itself from a universe that is seemingly non-living.
I am unsure of the exact mechanics of DNA and RNA. Nor do I know if these are the most basic of building blocks for life. However I am going to assume, for the sake of argument, that they are. If they are not you can quite easily, without breaking the point, replace their names with the actual names of the basic building blocks of life.
If you were to take the chemicals that naturally occur upon Earth that are responsible for these basic building blocks and you placed them in a large vat. Lets say a vat the size of a stadium, something far smaller than the size of the Earth (almost ridiculously so) and you left them to constantly react to one another every moment of every day, for years and years, I am certain that you would in return find yourself with extremely simple life.
This life would have an intelligence, however it would be absolutely basic. The operations of generating energy and replicating would be all that it does. Why? Well even non-living elements on the periodic table are (misnomer alert) instinctively searching to complete their outer electron shell. There is an inherent motivation to have a full ring and it is an ever present reality in our Universe. This basic need moves right on into life, the ever present desire to consume energy in order to complete operations that sustain a stable life pattern that gives the longest period of time to replicate and repeat this action.
This function is so fantastically simple that it requires little in the way of blind faith to accept. It essentially is the spawning of a billion light switches that have binary modes. They have two extremely basic functions and they repeat these functions over and over.
It is through this process of repetition and the ever present reality that nothing can (to our or at least my knowledge) perfectly replicate itself that we received change. These simple creatures began to have errors in their coding that resulted in extra operations becoming present. These extra operations, just like newer mechanical gadgets, presented even more gears to break. The more complicated anything gets the more there is to worry about after all.
These compounding functions, of replication, error, and growth result over a period of time to what we see today. It is not difficult to believe either, when watching bacteria replicating at nearly breakneck speed I find myself wondering just how many sneezes are going on in the process. How unrelated the bacteria a few days later are from their great ancestors of the days prior (assuming the bacteria has a short lifespan of course).
The shorter the lifespan of an organism the more present are these mechanisms I believe, because the shorter the lifespan of an organism, the more quickly it consumes and reproduces thus providing far more chances for replication and error. I’m sure this is not breaking science news for anyone but it is something I was thinking about recently. The point however is that at the most basic level of life. You really just have the same operations that are committed (at least in concept) at the electron level of elements. They are attempting to complete a simple circuit to establish a level of stability. It is this simple action that is present even in the non-living that drives all of life. Not necessarily the only thing, but I’m quite sure that the primary need of any organism is to maintain a stable energy level since every other operation after that requires it. You can’t exactly mate if you are dead…usually…ok there was that one time…wait…nevermind I’ve said too much.
I hope you enjoyed this thought experiment. Tonight I will also be publishing my final version of the Alabaster Bonobo: Tides of Chaos. If you ever needed a reason to dislike Microsoft here it is: They have Wal-Mart in their dictionary but not Bonobo.
“…how to go to heaven, not how the heavens go”
I’m sure I’ve quoted this enough times that it looks like I’d sleep with Galileo or at the very least take him to dinner (which I surely would…dinner that is). This phrase is, to me, one of the most powerful statements in the history of civilized man. The full line is "The Bible was written to show us how to go to heaven, not how the heavens go."
While I am known for my rather callous feelings towards religion. This is not the goal of this post and indeed 99% of my posts are not trying to butcher the faithful upon a pedestal. What I’m here to discuss today especially is what religion cannot do and will never be able to do.
There has never and will never be a scientific use for faith. All of the benefits that people get medically from being religious have been seen with equal success in merely positive people. It provides absolutely no aid to any real world field of science. This is no a negative to faith, because it was never meant to do such a thing (or at least I don’t believe it ever outwardly advertised such), however in modern day it is a huge flaw that is overlooked by many who have vendettas against certain scientific beliefs.
Obviously to many this is a post in response to intelligent design, formerly known as creationism, and even before that known by 4-5 names. As was stated in a very good book I’ve been reading (“only a theory”) it would appear that more often than not religion is not trying to explain how something works but instead is trying to merely get credit for the something.
You cannot discover how malaria spreads, why the suns light gives people skin cancer, nor can it even explain why people cannot breath underwater. We didn’t decode the human genome with a single bit of guidance by any book of faith nor did we make it to the moon through the discoveries found in any scripture.
There will never be a time when faith can properly function as a scientific tool and likewise there will never be a time when science can function properly as a tool of faith. Each is by its very roots incompatible with the other. This is not to say you cannot be a faithful scientist, that is a scientists who for whatever reason has religious convictions, but neither will benefit the other. They exist in solitude from one another and that is by no means a bad thing.
The danger is when we make the mistake of assuming that faith can save our biological selves. We do not need another era of trephinations to remind us of what happens when we fight that truth. So as many have, much more eloquently than I, this is a modest request to cease and desist with the incessant attempts to use faith as a tool of science. In the end it helps no one and creates various problematic and violent situations.
Well that’s it for today, I will likely discuss the book linked above once I finish it. It is fantastic though and roughly 50% of the way through it I suggest anyone read it who has the ability to do so.
Dinosaurs: The Final Exam (Part 1 of 2)
Today we’ll be discussing some interesting aspects about Dinosaurs and the Extinctions that ended their reign on the planet. Interesting stuff. Also knocks out one more class this quarter to have documentation for.
The first dinosaur we will talk about today is Pachycephalosaurus (which I assume means hard headed or thick skulled lizard). For those that have seen JP movies the following image will remind you of what it looked like with skin and CG
.
These little…well relatively little, they weren’t exactly things you could step on as a human, are pretty interesting when you take a look at their builds.
The top vertebrae in their spinal column locks in to the skull into what is called the “occiput”, this connection means that with their head down they (as the image above shows) have a perfect spinal alignment. Likewise their spine even has interlocking mechanisms so that if there is an impact they don’t slip out of place. They have pretty thugged out hips that are fused to that part of their spine which suggests that it transfers kinetic energy from their spine down through their legs and out to the Earth. From the evidence provided the appear to basically be bipedal versions of what class? That’s right:
While I imagine the Pachycephalosaurus is far more well kempt (they were picky about their looks…ok that’s probably not true), this is likely our modern analogy for the little buggers. However as stated in class (the real one I’m in not this fake study one I’m teaching), their heads don’t seem like they’d be suited for two dude dino’s to be headbanging to get some…well…banging done later. The rounded nature of their head means that they’d have to hit spot on to each other to not risk doing serious damage (which doesn’t seem to be the goal in most mating fights unless you are a pissed off hippo).
![]()
Mommy says we are special! RAWR!
However that sort of pointed skull would be perfect for directing the full weight of the dinosaurs energy into say…the ribs or even a leg bone of a dinosaur. It would more than likely break it which is really all they need to do to stop an attacker from trying to gobble them or their family up.
Their skulls are even built in such a way that kinetic energy should travel around their brain instead of into it, so while you might think these guys would bash themselves retarded in fights they actually could have held up quite well with whatever cognitive level dinosaurs had.
In the same clade but a little further up we have the Ceratopsia, if that sounds to you like Triceratops then you are in luck because that’s essentially what I’m about to talk about.
Firstly we are transitioning from mouthy looking mouths to beaky looking mouths. They had wide cheeks, and dental batteries inside their beaky mouths. If you have seen an elephants tooth you’ll know what a dental battery is (it is what it sounds like I suppose). Interestingly the frill on the neck is not something they all had.
We’ll start with the Psittacosaurus which sounds like something out of Pokemon, and frankly looks like something out of pokemon. This is likely the earliest of the group, with bipedal motion but large front arms suggesting they could have easily been used for walking as well (a transitionary animal). Cute little buggers. Beat, cheeks, and the gambit except no frill.
Next you have the Protoceratops which gets us closer to the stereotype for the species. These buggers were something like the size of a hog, which means they still could have killed you if they wanted to. The males apparently had a bump on their nose (perhaps a future horn) that made them sexually dimorphic from their lady friends, I suppose this is handy for poking some lady Protoceratops that just won’t pay attention to you. In their front legs their long narrow scapulas may have functioned as another joint which is kinda neat.
![]()
Above is a skeletal layout of a member of the Ceratopsidae. Again we are looking at sexual dimorphism in the skulls of these animals, specifically the frills and horns, interestingly also it looks like not only predators were trying to pwn the frills but so were other Ceratopsidae. The frills were highly vascularized which means they probably had a covering over them. They tend to be lightly built with holes in their structure (skeletally). Their frills likely had multiple uses from mating rituals, to defense, to heat discharge. Truly a functional flap.
One final note on these fellas is that the bones in the back of their skull were not only fused for support but also ended in a ball joint which helped it swivel nicely. Cool stuff.
So lets move on to the idea of Endothermic and Ectothermic organisms. For those of us who went through public school you have hot blooded and cold blooded. Basically you have Endothermic creatures which generate their heat internally, they tend to also be called Homeothermic which means they are basically the same temperature all the time. Humans for instances are Endothermic and Homeothermic, so are basically all mammals.
Your other set of animals are Ectothermic, their heat is generated externally and they are considered Poikilothermic, which means their temperatures vary. Basically when it comes to dinosaurs we are not sure if they were Endothermic or Ectothermic, however the ones we are finding with feathers are almost certainly Endothermic as they use the feathers to insulate. On the flip side you have massive dinosaurs who might have cooked if they didn’t have optimized systems. Albeit really there isn’t much to say that a giant ectotherm would do much better.
Also certain dinosaurs have been found dead covering their nests, which suggest warm blooded (keeping the eggs warm).
And with that we’ll stop this part of studying for today because I have to go read a silly book for an exam I have tomorrow.
No Pain, No Loss
I often wonder about pain. As someone who did very poor on his rotation during a few years of martial arts training I have a pretty consistent pain in my knees. Top that with the seemingly endlessly pinched nerve in my hip and I have all sorts of pain being sent to my brain.
But I’m left with questions, my pain tells me that something is wrong, but it is so vague that I cannot discern what operation would be best. Should the region be kept active to accelerate healing or should it be relaxed to lessen damage till the healing finishes. Is this pain likely to become a life threatening condition or is it merely a discomfort. I am left with an endless flow of data that makes no effort to cease and yet provides me with no new information.
Basically the cheapest car you’ll ever own will be able to tell you what is wrong with it, even if it is one of a few things it’ll still be specific enough to get it fixed. If this simple mechanic can be dropped into even the crappiest of cars, why on Earth has it not made it to organisms?
To me this would be one of the most helpful evolutionary traits one could possibly have. If you knew exactly what was wrong with you then you would have the best opportunity to fix the issue. Admittedly it would only be helpful with primates and humans since most other animals couldn’t articulate well enough to heal their injuries most times.
However it is a blaring issue I have with the ideas of humans being sculpted, if personal computers were so poor at articulating their problems (giving you the exact same report for absolutely any error possible) nobody would own one. Even when we joke and say they are vague a single google search can help even the most inept person figure out what is wrong and even how to fix it. However you can only wildly guess what is wrong with you through tools such as webMD. We essentially have ‘dull pains’ and ‘sharp pains’ and that is it. It is the most useless binary to ever exist that I’ve known.
How completely inept would a being have to be to develop such a terrible system of data transfer? Our brains can defuse insanely complicated puzzles and yet the simple information of “bruised vein” can’t travel from my arm to my brain through (essentially) the same electrical processes.
Pain is a failed experiment and serves very limited service, if the damage isn’t on the surface you can roll a dice on what is wrong with you. Is that a random chest pain or are you having a heart attack? Well we’ll know in about 10 minutes now won’t we.
Nonsense I tell you…utter nonsense.
The nature of odds.
I don’t think I could ever become a gambler now. In my Magic the Gathering decks I have (or rather had till now) 15 lands in a deck of 60, in theory that is 1 land for every 4 cards drawn. I would go for upwards of 5 entire turns (after drawing 7 cards) without seeing a single land sometimes or only seeing one.
That means with an average draw rate of 25% I wouldn’t see anything for a few hundred % worth of drawing. Now I realize that isn’t how ratios work nor is it how odds work, but it blew my mind.
As it stands just to get relatively consistent draws I had to upgrade to 20 lands for a sixty card deck, that means that 1 out of every 3 cards I draw is a land. That is insane that I had to jump to 33% just to see more than 2 lands in 10 draws.
Absolutely amazing and to me a good reason why you should never gamble. You will never do anything with these high of odds and considering the difficulty I’m having at these odds you’d be best to save your cash.
The Möbius Code (Part 4)
[ Index ]
Part 1 – The Introduction
Part 2 – From Universe to Solar System
Part 3 – From Solar System to Earth
So when last we met (if memory serves) we were discussing the first life on Earth. Tiny tiny little organisms that one cannot see with their naked eye (unless you squint really really hard…ok you still can’t). Slowly the organisms become more complex, initially it was a matter of symbiosis for at least some. Small organisms began fusing to one another (see mitochondria) to create more complex and indeed more efficient systems. With the noticeably copious amounts of space in the sea and the development of an Atmosphere there was not much to worry about but taking in energy, via eating or sunlight, and reproducing like you had nothing left to do.
Some organisms split like a particularly tasty banana in your ice cream, others mated. As time passed and the bigger is better mentality started to pick up we begin to see visible formations in the sea. Eventually plants will dominate the sea and spread out onto land. With the introduction of a nice firm atmosphere (firm my way of saying effective) to protect their cells from the ultraviolet sunlight there was little reason to stay bound to the sea. The first’ ‘animals’ would be completely secluded to the sea and would spread quite well. Considering the absolutely massive nature of the ocean and its ability to reduce gravity’s effect on organisms it makes surviving and growing much easier than on land (at least initially, these days you get eaten by many crazy animals in the sea).
Once the surface land is absolutely covered in plants (maybe sooner) there is a revelation, as always, a copious amount of food leads to the introduction of something that’ll eat it. Indeed someday there will be a bacteria that absolutely engorges itself on our plastic waste, it is just a matter of waiting. As the first animals move to land they bring a second source of food to the land, that being them. Carnivores would soon fill that gap as well. I often wonder if the copious levels of land carnivores are what lead some animals to return to the sea. Indeed all sea mammals are incidents of animals that were initially land mammals and moved to the sea. The motion of a dolphin is hauntingly similar to the motion of a gazelle, and in some cases you can find the remains of what once were legs in whale corpses and other sea mammals as they move ever closer to lose all evidence of their previous adventures on land.
Somewhere in here you have dinosaurs rise. They have a pretty long and successful run (I believe there was a mass extinction or two) until the drop of a meteor that I’ve read was large enough to fill the rose bowl (or some football stadium). It impacted somewhere in the gulf of Mexico and utterly dominated the planet. Basically all life on Earth died. Before this point there were tiny little mice like animals, which might not be accurate, so just imagine a cute little mammal of your choice. Essentially before Dinosaurs were extinguished this was the pinnacle of our particular class in the animal kingdom. After dinosaurs mammals popped out and started to show their talents. It would be some many millions of years but eventually a particularly successful class of apes came to be the most dominant of all animal species (relative to land mass covered…and I suppose not counting insects).
People often wonder why Humans made that jump mentally. As I’ve stated before I think it was a case of substantial amounts of food. Evolutionarily there is no real advantage to being exceedingly smarter than your prey, it doesn’t take much to catch a Gazelle, strength and big teeth will do it more often than not. However with a single mutation of the brain taking it just far enough above the average level of ape intelligence it would become, much like the original organisms spreading across the planet, a snowball effect. With every evolutionary generation the human brain would grow larger, at one time even there was more than one type of human. However, for reasons I don’t know personally, one particular answer I’ve heard was the mistake by the now extinct humanoids to let their opponents spread into Europe and across to Asia, this essentially locked them into a small area and they died off. But again take that with a grain of salt.
So slowly but surely, this ever increasing effect, like the pull of a black hole growing with each uncontrollable growth we move on to modern day. Which is where we will stop for now. Tomorrow may indeed be the final episode of this little collection. It’ll be about what is to come (in the most general of senses) and the ‘end’…as well as a bit of philosophy that I hope someday to get clarified.



