Posts tagged terrorism

The Vacation–Part 1: TSA

It has been quite a while. I’ve been out of town on my one year anniversary. It seems like just yesterday I was dreading the first dance and now we are here, so far ahead yet not too far at all. I’ll be discussing the vacation in a series of posts. Mostly because I suspect that this will go somewhat long. The general theme will be from negative to positive as I talk about the TSA, PAX, and the Vacation itself.

A bit of early spoiler is that the cruise was fantastic. But we’ll get to that when we do. First the TSA, which is not coincidentally the first part of the trip.

Since September 11th, a date close approaching once again, the TSA has been slowly expanding their grasp on airport security. You can learn more about this organization over at Wikipedia. However if you have access to the news you probably know a good deal. Be it Adam Savage getting on a plane with foot long razor blades, fake breasts removed, urinary bladder bursts, or manipulation of lines to get folks to pass through the new back scatter machines.

It is, at its heart, a business that is profiteering from the paranoia and passiveness of Americans. The gamble is that most American’s only fly once or twice a year, with this in mind they are unlikely to fight back against increasingly tight restrictions. With each passing year a new toy is passed without study and more people are subjected to systems that have in no way increased their safety. Each time some crazy person tries to sneak something on a plane they will add a new layer of complication that will only weaken the effectiveness of what they do.

A metal detector and an x-ray for bags would have stopped the 9/11 hijackers had blades not been allowed on planes. Further an understanding that not all people value life would have stopped the hijackers from holding the planes. It was the belief that all people wish to live that kept those passengers in their seats, not the blades in the hijackers hands.

There will never be another US airplane hijacking, not one that succeeds as those did 10 years ago. The next fool to try and take a plane will be beaten and likely killed, terrorism only works if you have the element of surprise or an element of anonymity. Once these are lost you are not likely to succeed or last long at all.

The San Jose Airport is, as of now, one of two airports that I use. It takes me to SeaTac and allows me to visit my in-laws. This airport has a few small (roughly the size of a sheet of paper) signs that say the X-Ray machines are not necessary and you can just use the metal detector. However the TSA agents that are there not only point people to the machines they also get grumpy if you decide to take the metal detector.

This grumpy response confuses me, because it seems to assume that I have something to hide. Perhaps the 25 years of being an American citizen have helped to foster some sort of super terrorist. Dear god…has Al Qaeda snuck into the wombs!

Regardless I took my first and last back scatter. I stood there in the same position a criminal would take on the ground, hands behind my head, legs spread, motionless. They snapped me and some random guy with likely no more qualifications than a Wal-Mart employee made sure I didn’t have C4 in my testicles.


Turns out I didn’t, which is good.

  I feel no love for the TSA, they have not since the day they founded made me any more safe. They have not even given me the feeling of being safe. What they have done is help bolster an amazingly misguided fear amidst 300 million people.

  The day I see the name of this organization on the budget cuts list I’ll be supremely pleased and that money could go towards something better, education, environmental preservation, or even mass transit. Any of these things would reduce our chances of terrorism more than the TSA.

  Also note that if anyone honestly wanted to do something terrible on a plane that they would. If a 25 year old American born male with no criminal record is likely to be a terrorist, how is a TSA agent a surefire bet?

  Now compare the idiocy I experienced at San Jose with SeaTac. I was dreading the flight back because of how much these people annoy me. I put my bags on the conveyor, walked up to the section where the metal detector and backscatter machines were situated. Standing behind the metal detector was the gate keeper for this row. He smiled at me, likely noticing my nervous demeanor and he waved his hand over to the metal detector. I walked through, no alarm went off, he told me “Have a great day sir!” and I said “Thanks and you too!”

  I grabbed my bags, put on my shoes, and waited for Liz. The entire sequence of events took a matter of seconds, I was treated like a human and put through an entirely respectable check. If that was all that the TSA was I’d be happy to have them around and that man that I dealt with in SeaTac was a shining example of the only kind of person that the TSA should hire.

  No sneers, no misguidance, he saw an American and he treated them as such. Hell, he saw a human and treated them as such.

  To be frank, I seem to recall always going through a metal detector. So I suppose what I’m asking for is a return to the system that would have worked fine. Certain events are once in a lifetime, box cutter evangelists are a thing of the past.

  So yes, my vacation started very poorly in San Jose. As I took an unnecessary smack of radiation to the organs. But the trip back is indicative of how the trip evolved. More to come.

The Failure of the Terror Alert

  I’m sure at this point most people know how futile the “Terror Alert” system is. There are no guidelines for how to act nor is there really a good outline of “Why” or “What” the increased or decreased terror alerts entail.

  If you go back far enough they essentially had a system like this during the cold war. However it was pretty straight forward. You knew if it was going we were being nuked and you needed to go to a shelter. It’s not fun information but at least in that situation it may have been necessary.

  The Terror Alert system however is entirely fruitless. It has been little more than a campaign tool. During the 2004 election campaign the Bush camp intentionally raised the threat level to help secure the win. You can find various websites and newspapers that covered this, if it so suites you.

  The goal of terrorism is to remain on peoples minds. I highly doubt that people will ever forget the events of Pearl Harbor, yet you will not find people incessantly reminding anyone to ‘never forget 12-7"’, it is this never ending push to not allow it to settle that feeds into the entire mechanic of terrorism. While at this point it is painfully clichéd I would say that the moment we decided to not let it rest was the day that the terrorists “won”.

  I realize they can’t win, I realize in death nobody wins, but egos demand that in all conflict there be a winner. While you will never truly find one you will at least find someone who claims to be that one. For as long as we have a terror alert level, for as long as we act differently because of what happened, for as long as we allow this facade that we are in any more danger now than we were before the twin towers, we have lost.

  The Terror Alert system was a failure the moment it was unveiled, it was an insult to intelligence and currently a tool only used for political gain. It is the demand to never forget terrorism that fuels terrorisms growth because it proves to them that they are successful.

  Then again, a simple plane ride, ferry ride, or train ride will prove to anyone that they were successful. How pitiful it is to watch 300 million change their lives because of the actions of a dozen.

A little homophobia kills a long way.

  While I imagine absolutely anyone reading this already knows I thought it was a fascinating tidbit to point out just how destructive petty prejudices can be. Case in point with the ever vocal homophobes in our country (which is beyond me, I don’t see what homosexuality has to do with anyone outside of those who are homosexual).

  For whatever reason a vast amount of the Arabic translators in the US military are (or I suppose I should say were) homosexual. Prior to the 9/11 attack the US intelligence agencies had received plenty of non translated material that all told could have quite easily raised our chances of preventing the attack to levels that are almost disgusting. Indeed even now the US has mounds of Arabic material that has either been poorly translated or not translated at all because they got rid of all the men and women who were willing to put their lives on the line for a military so prejudice that it would kick them out for something as unrelated as their sexuality.

  So what is the cost of Homophobia? 2,740. That’s how many people that died in the 9/11 terrorist attack, that’s almost three thousand people who likely all would have much as many talented people working in the military and intelligence agencies as possible. Not only this but the aftermath of the event has cost the lives of thousands more US soldiers, I’m pretty sure a few dozen reporters, and that doesn’t even count all the people who have died in Afghanistan and Iraq that aren’t related to these organizations that have died in the cross fire or shrapnel. Likewise the war itself could have been avoided (since its very hard to invade a nation if you aren’t already at war or have good reason to get going there).

  So the next time you see two men holding hands, or two women hugging and kissing before going about their day, and you feel a sickness in your stomach try to remember that that feeling cost the lives of thousands of people and for what? Because of some dark disgusting misinformed preconceptions you have about homosexuals? I hate to sound overly passionate about the topic because it might take away from my point but I am hard pressed to understand.

  People might think that prejudices are harmless when not directly hurting people, but in the end they cost the lives of far more people. It only takes a little nationally supported prejudice to cost the lives of tens of millions of people. Few people deserve to die and even that is questionable, in the end it is never the fault of one person for the actions of that one person, there are many variables that come into a strong collaborative image to make each and every one of us. However you can be certain in a country of dissension and judgmentalism, you will generate many many people who are destined for an early death.

Notes:

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0DE1DD1038F933A15752C0A9639C8B63 – 2005 Article on the topic, there are literally 10’s of thousands of them on the internet. Have an adventure and go google surfing, it’s an enlightening endeavor sometimes.

Go to Top